HTML

Friday, February 3, 2023

110 Legal phrases & Legal Maxim used in Laws that every law student must know.

110 Legal phrases & Legal Maxim used in Laws that every law student must know.

1 Suo moto: own motion

2 Deeming fiction cannot be stretched beyonyd the purpose for which it is created

3 The words used in Law are not used for nothing

4 To invoke Provision : To make use of particular provision

5 Ipso Facto: By this fact alone or because of this matter alone

6 ‘MAY’ may be treated as ‘SHALL’ but ‘SHALL’ shall not be treated as ‘MAY’

7 Tenable: Acceptable in law

8 Redundant Provision : Out of Force or Outdated Provision

9 Quasi : Almost Similar to

10 Quasi Criminal: Almost equal to criminal

11 Jurisprudence: Law relating to particular matter

12 Mensrea: Guilty Mind

13 Ibid: As printed earlier

14 Suo Moto: On its own

15 Prima Facie: On its face

16 Non est: What is not in existence / Non existing thing

17 Call in question: To challenge

18 De Nova: Completely New

19 Sine quo non: Most essential thing

20 Purposes of this Act: Proceeding must be pending

21 Reason to believe Vs Reason to suspect: Refer various caselaws

22 Derived from & attributable to: Derived from refers to direct connection with a particular matter whereas attributable to refers to an indirect connection

23 Mutatis Mutandis: After making necessary changes as may be required

24 Discovery Vs Detection: Discovery is made by the assessee whereas detection is done by the Assessing Officer

25 To Quash: The process of cancelling the proceeding of Assessing Authorities by Judicial Authorities

26 So far as may be: To the extent possible

27 Travisity of Justice : A ridiculous interpretation of a very serious statement, making a mockery of a very serious matter

28 To impugne : To challenge

29 Save as otherwise provided : Except to the extent as oppositely provided

30 If one section is overriding the other section : Use Words “Not withstanding
anything contained in ……”

31 If one section is superceded by the other section : Use words “Save as otherwise provided………..”

32 Other provisions apply in General way: Use words “Without prejudice to the provisions ……………..”
33 Reckoned : Recognised, Counted, Calculated
34 Doctrine of Merger: When an order passed by the lower authority is superceded by the higher authority
35 Doctrine : Principle or saying in general acceptance
36 In Pari Material Pavi Causa: Same material, same content {Eg. Sec. 24B of IT Act,1922 is Pari Material with Sec. 159 of IT Act, 1961. In such a case a judgement given in respect of section 24B would be valid in respect of sec. 159}
37 Per se : By itself
38 Cy Press : As near as possible
39 Tax is always charged, Interest is levied and Penalty is imposed
40 Deductions are admissible, Relief is granted.
41 Return is always furnished, Assessment order is made / passed.
42 De hors : Independent of
43 Order of Injunction of HC : Stay order.
44 Several Liability means separate liability. [Refer sections 168(3), 171(7), 179(1)178(5) & 188A.] 
45 Legatee is a person for whose benefit there exists an asset of a deceased
46 Locus Standi : Directly involved in relation or deal.
47 Garnishee Proceeding : The proceeding which gives Govt. the right to attach (i.e.forcibly take over) any asset from a person who is defaulter.
48 Vitiate Proceedings : To make proceedings null, void.
49 Inter alia : Among other things.
50 Audit Altream partem : It is a principle of natural justice. According to this principle, which is the principle in every civilized jurisprudence, a person against whom any action is sought to be taken or a person whose rights or interests are to be affected should be given a reasonable opportunity to defend himself.
 51 Resjudicata : [Once the decision of HC comes then on that same point again appeal cannot be made.] The issue of Law which has been already decided shall not be pleaded for review.
52 In Limine : At the outset (i.e. at the beginning)
53 Suspended animus : An order under Appeal is not subject to any action by any authority till the order disposing of the appeal is available.
54 Subjudice : Under an appeal to a court, decision awaited.
55 Adjudicate : Consider for judgement. A court adjudicates means gives its decision on a particular matter.
56 Akin : Similar to; of the same type
Coterminus : Similar to; of the same type
57 Impediment : Obstacles or Hindrance.
58 Sine Di: For indefinite period.
59 To deduce : Logically come to the conclusion.
60 Purview : Scope
61 Bounty : Additional Advantage
62 Ad Hoc : Without any particular rate, percentage, proportion.
63 Ad infinitum : Without any Time limit.
64 Ad interim : In the Mean Time
65 Bonafide : Genuine
66 Surmises : Presumptions, own assumptions
67 Defacto : Infact
68 Defjure : In Law, irrespective of whatever the facts.
69 Ejusdem Generis : Of the same kind
70 Ex-gratia : As a matter of grace ir favour
71 Ignorantia Legis known excusat : Ignorance of law is not excused
72 Mesne Profit : Profit earned by somebody by wrongful possession of property.
73 Modus Operandi : Mode of Operation / Manner of working
74 Nexus : Close connection link.
75 Onus probandi : Onus of proof / The burden of Proof.
76 Non obnstante clause : That provision has superceding effect on any other provision
77 Raison D’etre : Reason or justification for existence.
78 Ratio Decidendi : Reason for deciding / Grounds for decision
79 Suijuris : of his own right.
80 Assessee engaged in ……………. : The activity should have started
81 Option Vs Discretion : Whenever choices is available to the assessee in respect of any matter. Law uses the word at his option – for eg:
1. Sec 11(11) – Explanation to Sec. 11 (11)
2. Sec. 23(4)
82 amicus curiae : Friend of court; one who voluntarily or on invitation of the court, and not on instructions of any party, helps the court in any judicial proceedings
83 audi alteram : hear the other side. Both sides should be heard before a decision is arrived at
84 caveat emptor : let the purchaser beware. A ———- implying that the buyer must be cautious, as the risk is his and not that of the seller.
85 cestui que trust : a beneficiary under a trust, the person for whose benefit the trust is created
86 ex officio : by virtue of an office.
87 ex parte : exkpression used to signify something done or said by one person not in the presence of his opponent.
88 fait accompli : An accomplished act.
89 obiter diccum : an opinion of law not necessary to the decision. An exspression of opinion (formed) by a judge on a question immaterial to the ratio decidendi, and unnecessary for the decision of the particular case. It is no way binding on any court, but may receive attention as being an opinion of the high authority.
90 pendente lite : during litigation.
91 per incuriam : through carelessness, through inadvertence. A decision of the court is not binding precedent if given peer incuriam, that is, without the court’s attention having been drawn to the relevant authorities, or statutes.
92 pro tanto : to that extent, for so much, for as much as may be.
93 quid pro quo : the giving of one thing of value for another thing of value; one for the other; thing given as compensation.
94 Ratio Decidendi : Reason for deciding / Grounds for decision
95 res integra : an untouched matter; a point without a precedent; a case of novel impression.
96 rule njsi : a rule to show cause why a party should not do a certain act, or why the object of the rule should not be enforced.
97 in personam : against the person; an act or preceeding done or directed with
reference to no specific person or with reference to all whom it might concern.
98 in rem : an act / proceeding done or directed with reference to no specific person or with refernce to all whom it might concern.
99 inter vivos : between living persons.
100 intestate : a person is deemed to die intestate in respect of property of which he or she has not made a testamentary disposition (“will”) capable of taking effect.
101 intra vires : within the powers; within the authority given by law.
102 ipse dixit : he himself said it; there is no other authority.
103 ipso jure : by the law itself ; by the mere operation of law.
104 lis pe ndens : a pending suit.
105 rule absolute : when, having heard counsels, court directs the performance of that act forthwith.
106 sine die : without delay.
107 stare decisis : to stand by things decided; to abide by precedents where the same points come again in litigation.
108 status quo : existing condition.
109 sub judice : before a judge or court; pending decision of a competent court.
110 ultra vires : beyond one’s power

Monday, January 16, 2023

Cash keeping limit fixed at home: Income Tax Department fixed Cash keeping limit at home, Check new limit immediately otherwise it will be raided

Transaction of more than Rs 20 lakh in cash in a financial year can attract a fine.
It is necessary to give PAN number for depositing or withdrawing cash more than Rs 50,000 at a time.
If a person deposits 20 lakh rupees in cash in 1 year, then he will have to give information about PAN (PAN) and Aadhaar (Aadhaar).
Fine up to Rs 20 lakh may have to be paid for not giving information about PAN and Aadhaar.
You cannot shop for more than Rs 2 lakh in cash.
A copy of PAN and Aadhaar card will have to be given if purchases of more than Rs 2 lakh are made in cash.
The person can come on the radar of the investigating agency on the purchase and sale of property worth more than Rs 30 lakh in cash.
At the time of payment of Credit-Debit Card card, if a person pays an amount of more than Rs 1 lakh in one go, then investigation can be done.
Can’t take cash more than Rs 2 lakh from your relatives in 1 day. This has to be done through the bank.
The limit for donating in cash has been fixed at Rs 2,000.
No person can take a loan of more than 20 thousand in cash from another person.
You will have to pay TDS if you withdraw more than Rs 2 crore cash from the bank

How much fine will you have to pay if you are caught with unaccounted cash at home? According to the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) in this regard, if you are unable to tell the source of money kept at home, then you may have to pay a fine of up to 137 percent.


Wednesday, November 30, 2022

court fee comparison

നീതി നികുതി കൊള്ളയിൽ നമ്പർ വൺ  കേരളം.
----------------------------------------
നീതിയ്ക്ക് നികുതി എന്നാൽ- 'കോർട്ട്  ഫീസ്' എന്ന ഓമനപ്പേരിൽ ഈടാക്കുന്ന തുക. അഥവാ, ന്യായം തേടി  കോടതിയെ സമീപിക്കുന്ന ഒരാൾ, കോടതിയ്ക്ക് കൂലിയായി ഒടുക്കേണ്ട രൂപ. ഈ തുക കൊള്ളപ്പലിശയേക്കാൾ കൂടുതൽ ആണ് എന്നതാണ് വാസ്തവം. കൊള്ളയോടൊപ്പം പിടിച്ചു പറി കൂടി ഉണ്ട്- അതാണ് ലീഗൽ ബെനെഫിറ് ഫണ്ട് എന്ന പേരിൽ ഈടാക്കുന്ന  ഒരു ശതമാനം അധികം.
ഇതാ കണക്കു നോക്കൂ പത്തു ലക്ഷം രൂപ വായ്പ നൽകിയത് മടക്കി കിട്ടാൻ അന്യായം നൽകിയാൽ, കോടതിയ്ക്ക് കൊടുക്കേണ്ട കൂലി- സംസ്‌ഥാനം- കൂലി എന്ന കണക്കിൽ-
ആന്ധ്രാപ്രദേശ്- 12,426
ബിഹാർ- 18,920//-
ദൽഹി- 12,104
ഗുജറാത്ത്- 23,950
ഹരിയാന- 58,800/-
ഹിമാചൽ പ്രദേശ്-  12,560
ജമ്മുകശ്മീർ- 24,600
കർണാടക- 62,125
മധ്യപ്രദേശ്- 95,000
ജാർഖണ്ഡ് -18,920
മഹാരാഷ്ട്ര- 24,430
ഒഡിഷ- 20,790 
പഞ്ചാബ്- 26,850/
രാജസ്‌ഥാൻ- 62,125
തമിൾ  നാട്- 75,000
ഉത്തർ പ്രദേശ് -75,408 
ഉത്തരാഖണ്ഡ്- 75,408
പശ്ചിമ ബംഗാൾ -. 24,980
ഇനി നമ്മുടെ നമ്പർ വൺ കേരളം-
98,400 + 10000 = 108400- ഒരു ലക്ഷത്തി എണ്ണായിരത്തി നാനൂറു രൂപ!
ഇനി ഇത്രയും കൊടുത്തേക്കാമെന്നു വെച്ചാലും, നീതി കിട്ടുമോ?

 

Thursday, November 10, 2022

Explanation for the defects notified by the Registry

MOST URGENT

MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA 
Advocate
101, Gundecha Chambers, Nagindas Master Rd, Kala Ghoda, Fort, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400001 
E-mail: mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com Mob:9820535428
10.11.2022

To, 
The Registrar,
Supreme Court of India,
New Delhi. 

Sir, 
Sub: Mathews J. Nedumpara v. The Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India W.P (diary) no. 35794 of 2022- Explanation for the defects notified by the Registry at Serial nos. 4 and 5 – reg.

1. The Registry of the Supreme Court has notified 6 defects of which, except for Nos. 4 and 5, have been cured/rectified. 
Defect no. 4
2. Defect no. 4 is “In Person to clarify the maintainability of prayer G, H and I in view of the subject of the instant petition”. The maintainability of the prayers is a matter falling in the exclusive province of the Hon’ble Court. If the maintainability could be decided by the Registry, then there would not be any need for a court at all. The objection is wholly unmaintainable. Be that as it may, I wish to make it clear that the Registry has not whatsoever indicated the reasons why they consider the prayer G, H and I are not maintainable. I am left with no option than to deduce what it could possibly be.
3. Explanation with regard to Prayer “G”- In jurisprudence, a judicial enquiry falls into two categories: a) concerning the jurisdiction of the Court and b) the merits of the actual controversy. So far as jurisprudence is concerned, there are two kinds of issues, “issues going to the jurisdiction” to borrow an expression of Lord Reid in Anisminic v. Foreign Compensation Commission, (1969) 2 AC 147, and “issues within the jurisdiction”. “Jurisdiction is a verbal coat of many colours” said Justice K.K. Mathew. A suit or proceedings may be barred by cause of action estoppel, nay, res judicata. A suit or proceedings may be barred by limitation/delay, or may be barred by monetary or territorial limits. These questions of jurisdiction are called substantive and adjectival, respectively. So far as the Petitioner/litigants are concerned, the right to institute a petition under Article 32 in itself is considered to be a fundamental right. A court considering a petition under Article 32, as is the case of a Civil Court, is duty bound to adjudicate all questions concerning jurisdiction, whether substantive or adjectival.
4. Since the Registry has not given any indication as to what is on its mind as to the nature of the objection, to repeat, I am forced to make a wild guess. The only thing that comes to my mind is whether the Registry assumes “prayers G, H and I” to be barred by the doctrine of res judicata/estoppel. Assuming that is the case, the Petitioners assert prayers are not barred by res judicata. 
5. The core of the doctrine of res judicata is the adjudication of a lis on its merits, affording the parties concerned a full opportunity to be heard adhering to the natural justice, to adduce evidence and argue their case. If there is no decision on the merits, the doctrine of res judicata has no application at all. The petitions preferred by Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 seeking a declaration that the NJAC judgment is void/review of the same was dismissed, in chambers, without hearing the Petitioners, by way of cyclostyle, brief, cryptic order. There is absolutely no bar of the instant petition by virtue of the doctrine of res judicata. To repeat, in the earlier proceedings nothing was decided on its merits, nor were the Petitioners even heard. 
6. Explanation with regard to Prayer “H”- The objection that prayer “H” is not maintainable is wholly unfounded. Prayer “H” is for a declaration that the rule that a curative petition is maintainable only upon being supported by a certificate of a Senior Advocate is violative of Article 14. The said rule has resulted in denial of the fundamental right of the Petitioners to file a curative petition aggrieved by the dismissal of their review petition. 
7. Explanation with regard to Prayer “I”- The explanation offered above for prayer “G” equally apply for the objections concerning prayer “I”. To repeat, had the Supreme. Court heard the petition seeking review of the NJAC preferred by Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 and rejected the same offering reasons, then, probably, the doctrine of res judicata would have applied. The Court did not hear Petitioner nos. 1 and 2 or record their arguments on the merits of the NJAC issue. The Petitioners, therefore, are not barred by the doctrine of res judicata/estoppel. 
8. Though I have given a separate explanation for each prayer, it was not necessary at all. Whether a declaration ought to be sought or not is the province of the petitioner/plaintiff, and whether to grant it or not is in the province of the Court. The Registry has no role whatsoever with regard to pure questions of law. 
9. As aforesaid, at any rate, these issues are substantial questions of pure jurisprudence, which with all respect to the officers of the Registry, the humble Petitioners submit to be beyond the scope of scrutiny of the Registry. 

Defect no. 5 
10. Defect no. 5 is “in Person to further clarify regarding Respondent no. 5 to 14 as to whether they are necessary parties as clarification at Para 6 Page 8 of the petition is incomplete”. The NJAC case was about the constitutionality of the Constitution 99th (Amendment) Act and the NJAC Act. The said Acts were passed by the Parliament unanimously. It was the will of the people. No Court or authority has power to undo it. But the SCAORA got it quashed behind the backs of the people of this country. They did not bring on the party array any of the political parties, not to speak of even the ruling BJP and the Congress, the principal opposition party. Not a single Member of Parliament was on the party array, the SCAORA played a fraud on the people by obtaining a judgment behind the back of the people of this country. If SCAORA’s petition was assumed to be maintainable, then the principles applicable to a representative suit/class action ought to have been followed. A few lawyers were able to get the NJAC Act quashed because they were powerful. The petitioner/plaintiff is the dominus litus. He/she is the master of the proceedings. It is for him/her to decide who is to be on the party array. If he/she fails to bring the necessary parties on the party array, his/her petition/proceedings is rendered void ab initio. The Registry has no objection that the Petitioners have failed to bring on the party array all the necessary parties. On the contrary, it has objected to the Petitioners bringing the State Governments and the major political parties on the party array. If at all the Petitioner can be faulted, it could only be for not bringing in all the State Governments on the party array. The Petitioner has craved the leave of the Hon’ble Court to do so in due course. The objection of the Registry on this count is, therefore, misconceived. 
11. This explanation, the Petitioners, in all humility, hope would satisfy the Registry and that the petition will be numbered in no delay. 


With kind regards, 

Yours Sincerely, 


MATHEWS J. NEDUMPARA
9820535428
mathewsjnedumpara@gmail.com

Tuesday, November 1, 2022

doctrine of pleasure

The doctrine of pleasure has its origins in English law. In England, the moral rule is that a civil servant of the Crown holds office during the pleasure of the Crown. This means his services can be terminated at any time by the Crown, without assigning any reason.
The story so far: Kerala Governor Arif Mohammed Khan and the State government have major differences over multiple issues. The latest controversy has arisen after he sought the resignation of several vice-chancellors following a Supreme Court judgment setting aside the appointment of the Vice-Chancellor of a technology university. As a fallout of comments made by the State’s Finance Minister, K. N. Balagopal, the Governor has also sought his dismissal from his Cabinet, declaring that he has withdrawn the pleasure of having him in the Council of Ministers.

Confirmation bias

confirmation bias, the tendency to process information by looking for, or interpreting, information that is consistent with one's existing beliefs. This biased approach to decision making is largely unintentional and often results in ignoring inconsistent information.

For example, imagine that a person believes left-handed people are more creative than right-handed people. Whenever this person encounters a person that is both left-handed and creative, they place greater importance on this "evidence" that supports what they already believe. This individual might even seek proof that further backs up this belief while discounting examples that don't support the idea.

Confirmation biases impact how we gather information but also influence how we interpret and recall information. For example, people who support or oppose a particular issue will not only seek information to support it, but they will also interpret news stories in a way that upholds their existing ideas. They will also remember details in a way that reinforces these attitudes.

History of Confirmation Bias

The idea behind the confirmation bias has been observed by philosophers and writers since ancient times. In the 1960s, cognitive psychologist Peter Wason conducted several experiments known as Wason's rule discovery task. He demonstrated that people tend to seek information that confirms their existing beliefs.

Signs of Confirmation Bias

When it comes to confirmation bias, there are often signs that a person is inadvertently or consciously falling victim to it.3 Unfortunately, it can also be very subtle and difficult to spot. Some of these signs that might help you identify when you or someone else is experiencing this bias include:

  • Only seeking out information that confirms your beliefs and ignoring or discredit information that doesn't support them.
  • Looking for evidence that confirms what you already think is true, rather than considering all of the evidence available.
  • Relying on stereotypes or personal biases when assessing information.
  • Selectively remembering information that supports your views while forgetting or discounting information that doesn't.
  • Having a strong emotional reaction to information (positive or negative) that confirms your beliefs, while remaining relatively unaffected by information that doesn't.

Types of Confirmation Bias

There are a few different types of confirmation bias that can occur. Some of the most common include the following:

  • Biased attention: This is when we selectively focus on information that confirms our views while ignoring or discounting data that doesn't.4
  • Biased interpretation: This is when we consciously interpret information in a way that confirms our beliefs.
  • Biased memory: This is when we selectively remember information that supports our views while forgetting or discounting information that doesn't.5

Examples of the Confirmation Bias

It can be helpful to consider a few examples of how confirmation bias works in everyday life to get a better idea of the effects and impact it may have.

Interpretations of Current Issues

One of the most common examples of confirmation bias is how we seek out or interpret news stories. We are more likely to believe a story if it confirms our pre-existing views, even if the evidence presented is shaky or inconclusive.6 For example, if we support a particular political candidate, we are more likely to believe news stories that paint them in a positive light while discounting or ignoring those that are critical.

Consider the debate over gun control:

  • Let's say Sally is in support of gun control. She seeks out news stories and opinion pieces that reaffirm the need for limitations on gun ownership. When she hears stories about shootings in the media, she interprets them in a way that supports her existing beliefs.
  • Henry, on the other hand, is adamantly opposed to gun control. He seeks out news sources that are aligned with his position. When he comes across news stories about shootings, he interprets them in a way that supports his current point of view.

These two people have very different opinions on the same subject, and their interpretations are based on their beliefs. Even if they read the same story, their bias shapes how they perceive the details, further confirming their beliefs.

Personal Relationships

Another example of confirmation bias can be seen in the way we choose friends and partners. We are more likely to be attracted to and befriend people who share our same beliefs and values, and less likely to associate with those who don't. This can lead to an echo chamber effect, where we only ever hear information that confirms our views and never have our opinions challenged.

Wednesday, January 26, 2022

Writing an Invitation Letter for a Visa Application

Embassies around the world, often ask for documents that seem confusing, especially to travelers that apply for the first time for a visa. However, with a little bit of work the applicant can find out a lot about each document, how to obtain it, and why it is needed.

A letter of invitation is among the documents that first-time-applicants have difficulties understanding its purpose. Actually, everything related to a Letter of Invitation is pretty simple and easy.

What is an Invitation Letter for Visa Application?

An Invitation Letter for a visa application is a letter that the applicant has to submit to the embassy or consulate where they are applying for a visitor visa.

This document is written by the applicant’s host and addressed either to the applicant or to the consular officer, confirming that they will accommodate the applicant in their home for the whole period of their stay in the country where the host lawfully resides.

What are the Requirements to Write a Letter of Invitation?

The host must fulfill the following requirements in order for the letter of invitation to be valid:

  • must be a citizen or lawful permanent resident of the country you plan on visiting
  • must be your friend, boyfriend / girlfriend or family member / relative
  • must have a registered place (home, flat)
  • must have enough room for the applicant

The Letter of Invitation is not required by every embassy in the world, but it is strongly recommended to submit one even if not required.

How to Write a Letter of Invitation for Visa Application?

To many it might sound confusing, but writing a letter of invitation might be the easiest part of your visa application, if you have rightly understood what it serves for. The letter has to be written by the guest and addressed either to you or to the consular officer. Some embassies have their own invitation form, therefore, make sure to check about it when you get the checklist of visa required documents. If they already have a form, then your host will only have to fulfill the empty spaces with the right information.

But even if they do not, below we have listed some samples which you can use by replacing the information according to your case.

When writing an invitation letter, the main thing the writer has to keep in mind, is that the letter must include some important details, of the host and the guest. The letter must contain the following information about the host:

.

  • Full name
  • Date of birth
  • Address
  • Telephone number
  • Occupation
  • Type of home (owned / rent house / flat / room)
  • Host’s status in the host country (If the host is residing in that country a work visa, student visa, permanent resident, or is a citizen or any other legal status)
  • Signature

On the other side, the letter must also include the following information about the guest:

  • Full name as shown on their International Passport
  • Date of birth
  • The person’s address and telephone number
  • Relationship between the host and the guest
  • The purpose of the trip (friendly visit, holiday, wedding, birthday party.)
  • Exact entry date and exit date

If the letter is addressed to the guest do not make it sound too official. It is better if it sounds more personal and friendlier rather than formal, so that the consular officer can have a better sight of the relationship between the host and the guest...

Letter of Invitation Supporting Documents

As mentioned above, in many embassies the Letter of Invitation is not a requirement, therefore the host is not obliged to send other documents alongside with it. Still, even if the letter is a requirement or not, it would be very thoughtful if the applicant submitted any of the following documents alongside with the Letter of Invitation:

  • A scanned copy of host’s ID / passport
  • Evidence of means of subsistence (if the host will financially support the guest)
  • Proof of home / flat ownership or rental contract
  • An Itinerary of the places planned to visit together
  • If the host has taken days off from work to be with you during your period of stay in their country, then submitting a document that proves that would be in your favor

Where to Submit the Letter of Invitation?

The letter is submitted by the guest at the embassy or consulate along with the visa document file. The host must scan it and send it to the guest, who will later submit it with the other supporting documents on the day of their appointment at the embassy or consulate.

Letter of Invitation Samples

A fixed method or style of writing an invitation letter does not exist. It is up to the writer to decide what he or she wants to include in their letter. As long as the letter contains the above listed details among others, then the letter is just fine.

Sample of Letter of Invitation addressed to the embassy

Date]
The [country] Embassy,
[Address]

Letter of Invitation for [Visitor’s Name]: Passport No:XXX77777

Dear Sir/Madam

I am writing this letter to support the visitor visa application for [Visitor’s Name].

She / he is fully resident in [country], and is my [relationship]. She / he lives at [Visitor’s Address] and their home phone number is (YY)XXXXXXX.

I am a legal permanent resident of the [Guest’s Home Country], and I live at [Guest’s Home Address], and I work as [Guest’s Occupation] – with a net income of $XXX per year. I would like [Visitor’s Name] to come and visit me from [Date of Entry] to [Date of Exit] because of [you might give a reason as wedding, birthday, baby shower, graduation, etc.]

My request is that she / he would be granted with a visa for this whole period, in which time I would be fully responsible and cater to her / his well being. She / he will also be resident at my home, and following the expiration of her / his visa, I will see that [Visitor’s name] return to her / his home country.

Kindly find attached, all necessary documentation required.

Thanks in anticipation of your favorable response

Thank you.

Sincerely
[Host’s Name]
[Host’s Date of Birth]
[Host’s Address]
[Host’s Phone Number]
[Host’s signature]

Sample of Letter of Invitation addressed to the guest

[Date]

Letter of Invitation for [Visitor’s Name]: Passport No:XXX77777

Dear [Visitor’s Name],

As a follow-up to our phone conversation, please take this as a formal invitation to visit me in [country]. It’s been a long time since I last saw you [use a word that would describe your relationship: mom / dad / sister / my friend / my love etc.] and I am full of excitement that you will finally be able to meet all the people who have made my stay in [country] so beautiful.

While you are here, I will be responsible for your accommodation, feeding and movement around [country] from the day you arrive from [Visitor’s Home country] on [Entry Date] until the day you leave on [Date of Exit].

Herewith I am sending all the required documents for getting the necessary visa from the [country] Embassy.

Can’t wait to meet you here

[Host’s name]
[Full address]
[Country]
Occupation: [Host’s occupation]
Phone Numbers:
Work: [(xxx) xxx-xxxx]
Home: [(xxx) xxx-xxxx]
Email: [email address]
[Signature]